Multiboxers have to click. Previously CCP have stated that as long as a physical click happens it doesn't matter how many simultaneous client clicks that generates, but if a click is generated without a physical click, then it's bannable. so what you have, which is essentially an autopilot bot, is very very bannable.

If I can find the CCP quote I'll link it.

but as long as it requires 1:1 human input rather than make use of machine-genrateed input, it doesn't qualify for the only definition that matters: the EULA one, according to which multiboxing is not a violation.

Uhm, yes. I'm still right. As demonstrated by every single official communication on the matter.

and that argument has always been factually incorrect since it ignores both reality and every definition that matters.

If you click a button, all that happens is that you click a button.

except that CCP happily foregoes profit to uphold the rule against automation. State is as much as you like, it is completely contradicted and disproven by reality.

What? Could you please rephrase that as a coherent sentence.

which is proven false by the fact that CCP happily get rid of accounts that could be making them money. So how do you square that fact with your presumed reasoning?

It is true, and that's why people use it: because it doesn't automate anything and requires manual input, and thus don't break the rules.

Just because you can't counter an argument doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Please try again: how do you square the very simple and much-publicised fact that they will happily jettison thousands of accounts with the presumption that they only allow multiboxing because it requires lots of accounts?

2. You think that ISBoxer is automation, which is untrue. It just copies the MANUAL input over multiple clients and thus is not automated. If said person would walk away from the keyboard, all 20+ accounts would do NOTHING.